Food
and drink are evocative memory generators that can help us relive past
experiences. Furthermore, old recipes can help us experience the lives of our
ancestors. It has become fashionable to drink beers that are brewed from old
recipes. In a sense, what we are doing is drinking history. In our travel
explorations, both physically and temporally, we endeavor to make connections
with other cultures, our memories or our heritage. In many ways it is a natural
response to the globalized food and beverage world of the early 21st century.
Growing
up in Louisville there were often a number of bars around that would display
Oertels ’92 signs. It was a local brewery that was long out of business by the
time I was old enough to try beer. I often wonder what the beer taste like (I
understand that it would have been, most likely, disappointing). There is a
connection, in my mind, between the history of Louisville and Oertels. Many of
the neighborhood “beer joints,” as my grandparents referred to them, proudly
displayed the name of the tavern on beer’s logo. Although my grandparents
occasionally imbibed, the so-called beer joint on the corner was a source of
great consternation. No doubt it was contrary to their German-American belief
in the essential necessity of consistent work as they cornerstone to success
and salvation. Yet, at the same time, drinking beer was a part of their German heritage.
Concerns
about alcohol became prevalent as industrialization and the modern world began
to take hold. Most of these concerns were focused on the working class.
Reformers were concerned that workers would not be able to adequately perform
their jobs if they imbibed too much during their off-hours. If too many workers
resorted to alcohol use, then factories would not run at peak efficiency, or at
worst stand idle. Thus, one of the motivations to limit access to alcohol was
economic in nature. In the United States, a dalliance with prohibition reset
the brewing history of the country. Prior to the First World War there were
over a thousand breweries that dotted the country. Anti-German sentiments and proposals
by the Anti-Saloon League for a ban on the sale of grains to brewers and
distillers, helped to cut the number of breweries by half within the first
months of the war. Beer became synonymous with treason in the United States
because the public thought most beer was from Germany. No one mentioned the
beer from Belgium or Ireland during this time.
A water fountain, in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, placed by the Women's Christian Temperance Union during prohibition in 1929. |
The
introduction of prohibition, through constitutional amendment, shuttered most of
the remaining breweries across the United States. The emergence of a temperance
movement in the late nineteenth century by the puritanical impulse meant that
between 1920 and 1933, alcohol was not allowed to be sold. This had a
devastating effect on American beer production and, in many ways, reset the
history of American beer. Some brewers, such as Budweiser, made non-alcoholic
beverages during this time. Budweiser was called Bevo, but when you are on tour
at the Budweiser factory do not ask any questions about it. You get a polite,
no comment and the tour moves on.
As
with many families, there are vignettes about life during prohibition. My
grandmother tells a story about her father in upstate New York. One night,
while she was staying with him, a police officer came to the door and took her
father into town. It turns out that there was a federal agent in town and the
local law enforcement agency needed to demonstrate its effectiveness in
enforcing prohibition. Apparently my great-grandfather helped to stage a
bootlegging operation, was arrested in front of the federal agents, and when
the agents left town, was released.
Following the lead of the United
States, and with the help of American Dry forces, New Zealand nearly instituted
Prohibition in 1919. In April 1919 a
national referendum on prohibition yielded 49% of the vote to prohibition. As the
first votes were reported it appeared that dry forces had carried the day. It
was not until after the votes of New Zealand soldiers who were still overseas
were counted tipped the scales, was it realized that proposal was defeated. Today
the referendum is referred to as the soldier’s vote.
In
Britain, the emancipation of women after the First World War led to concerns
about the effect of alcohol on females. The idea of returning to a romantic
past, where women did not drink is ahistorical. Prior to the modern age, many
people, especially in Europe, drank some form of alcohol because it was
imminently safer to drink than water. Yet
in a 1926 article in the Manchester
Guardian, a doctor complained that ‘girls’ had been consuming more alcohol
and it “was distasteful to those who remembered the healthy lives that women
lived formerly.” The doctor went on to suggest that the increased partying
among women was having an effect on the health and beauty. The article
intimated that the partying without appropriate sleep led to “the lines that
rightly belonged to the woman of middle-age” in girls as young as 20. In
calling for a return to the Victorian Era, the article suggested that young
girls had “acquired the habit of living for excitement so much so that they
found themselves unable to break the habit and live a normal life with any
prospect of happiness.”
Despite
these concerns, the real problem with alcohol was, and is, the overindulgence.
Early nineteenth century French thinker Jean Anthelme Brilat-Savarin, in his
classic work on food, remind us: “Those persons who suffer from indigestion, or
who become drunk, are utterly ignorant of the true principles of eating and
drinking.” The culture of massive alcohol consumption obfuscates refined
techniques and craftsmanship. It hides a legacy of sharing a drink and
conversation passed from one generation to another. It diminishes a history of
common people, who worked hard enjoyed time away from their labors.
No comments:
Post a Comment